Lately I’ve been thinking a lot about how far replica technology could go. I mean, some of the newest GMT Master II clones already feel almost indistinguishable from the real thing in photos and videos. Do you think there will be a point where a replica could actually fool even seasoned collectors, or will there always be a clear line between a clone and an original?
top of page
To see this working, head to your live site.
The future of replicas — how technology might change the industry and where the line between a clone and an original will be drawn
The future of replicas — how technology might change the industry and where the line between a clone and an original will be drawn
2 answers0 replies
2 Comments
Commenting on this post isn't available anymore. Contact the site owner for more info.
bottom of page
It’s fascinating to see how fast technology can shift expectations. Even outside watches, products in general are reaching a point where look and feel alone aren’t enough to distinguish originals from high-quality copies. People may start relying more on authentication services, digital certificates, or unique identifiers rather than just judging by sight or touch. This seems like a trend that could reshape a lot of luxury markets.
From my experience, the gap is definitely shrinking. I played around with a Perfect replica Rolex GMT-Master II recently, and the finishing, bezel color, and bracelet feel were shockingly close to the real deal. I think as tech like CNC machining and ceramic inserts get more advanced, replicas might reach a point where they’re functionally very close to originals. Still, I feel there will always be subtle cues collectors notice, like micro-details or provenance.